Policy & Practice | Fall 2026

FFPSA GOALS continued from page 8

Technological Challenges of Implementing Community Pathways While many child welfare agencies recognize the importance of coordi nated community-based prevention systems, they often encounter signifi cant technological obstacles during implementation. Fragmented Systems and Data Silos Most social and human services ecosystems were not designed for cross-agency collaboration. Child welfare agencies, behavioral health providers, courts, schools, and community-based organizations often operate on entirely separate technological platforms with limited interoperability. As a result: n Referral information is often dupli cated across systems n Providers lack visibility into a family’s service status n Agencies struggle to track outcomes across programs Without integrated systems, the coor dination of prevention services becomes labor-intensive and difficult to sustain. Limited Closed-Loop Referral Capabilities A referral is only meaningful if agencies know whether services were actually delivered. Many jurisdictions rely on “open-loop” referrals, where one organization sends information to another without visibility into what happens next. Families may face long waiting lists, communication break downs, or eligibility issues without the referring agency ever knowing the outcome. FFPSA’s emphasis on accountability and EBPs requires far greater trans parency. Agencies increasingly need “closed-loop” referral management systems that can include a number of

Without these functionalities, prevention systems cannot reliably measure effectiveness. Data Governance and Privacy Cross-sector collaboration intro duces complex questions about data sharing, confidentiality, consent management, and compliance. Child welfare agencies must account for

Closed-loop referral management systems also play a critical role in helping jurisdictions maximize Title IV-E funding to support prevention services delivered via community pathways. By connecting families to EBPs and tracking referrals through service completion, these systems create the documentation and outcome data needed to demonstrate compliance with Title IV-E preven tion requirements under FFPSA. This ensures that eligible children and families receive timely services while generating reliable data on service uti lization, engagement, and outcomes, all of which support continuous quality improvement activities. By effectively documenting referrals, monitoring family engagement and participation in services, and tracking individual level well-being and permanency outcomes data, jurisdictions have the necessary evidence required to draw down federal Title IV-E funds and reinvest those resources in expanding preventive, family-strengthening services that help families remain safely together and reduce the need for out-of-home placements. As child welfare systems continue to prioritize family preservation and upstream pre vention, community pathways provide the infrastructure needed to turn community connections into measur able outcomes. Closed-loop referral systems can support building stronger networks for children, youth, and families before challenges escalate into crises. Alana Barr is a Policy Analyst at Chapin Hall. Jennifer O’Brien is a Senior Policy Fellow at Chapin Hall. Yolanda Green-Rogers is a Senior Policy Analyst at Chapin Hall. Reference Note 1. Wilks, O., & Thomas, K. (2024). Establishing community pathways to prevention services: In the context of the Family First Prevention Services Act. (Meeting Family Needs series). Chapin Hall.

various implications, such as: n Compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) n State confidentiality laws n Consent tracking n Role-based access controls

Building trust among partner orga nizations requires clear governance structures and technology that support secure information sharing while pro tecting sensitive family data. Outcomes Measurement and Reporting One key component of the FFPSA legislation pertains to measuring and monitoring outcomes for EBPs, yet many agencies lack the infrastructure to aggregate and analyze prevention data across providers and service categories. Without a centralized reporting and analytics system, agencies struggle to evaluate prevention investments or demonstrate impact to federal and state partners. In child welfare, making a referral is only the first step. What matters most is whether children and families actually receive the services that they need. As more states and jurisdictions seek to con ceptualize and implement community pathways, closed-loop referral manage ment systems are becoming foundational infrastructure for prevention ecosys tems. These systems do more than automate referrals—they create a shared operational environment to monitor EBP outcomes and foster care entry in real time while preserving family privacy. Why Closed-Loop Referral Management Systems Matter

functionalities, such as: n Referral acceptance n Service engagement n Service completion n Ongoing outcomes

Policy & Practice Fall 2026 44